Bilateral Agreement Easa Anac

No Comments

These agreements will ensure the continuity of agreements with the United States, Canada, Brazil and Japan when the United Kingdom leaves the European Union. In addition to airworthiness certification, basas, MoUs and WAs offer bilateral cooperation in other areas of aviation, including maintenance, air operations and environmental certification. Finally, Transport Canada is developing guidelines for the adoption of work by duly certified maintenance organizations outside the geographic boundaries of the United States or Canada (or another country that does not have a maintenance agreement with Canada). The theory is that if Transport Canada or the FAA accepted the work of a duly certified organization within the United States or Canada, why would they not recognize the same interview if it was done by an FAA or TCCA certificate holder outside one of the two countries? The problem is due to the geographical restrictions inherent in most bilateral agreements, although it is possible to address this problem if the authorities are prepared to do so. The FAA and EASA have issued many “foreign” AMO certificates compared to a much smaller number for Canada and Brazil. For example, if a maintenance organization in Mexico has an EASA Part 145 certificate but wishes to work on items of U.S. registration status, the FAA would require it to obtain an FAA certificate for foreign repair stations instead of recognizing its EASA certificate. THE AESA would do the same. Perhaps both authorities should reconsider this issue. Bilateral agreements and agreements allow the sharing of the airworthiness certificate for civil aviation products between two countries. In accordance with the bilateral agreement INTER the EU and the United States (BASA) (see here), you can only import an engine with “rebuild” status in Block 11 if it has been released by the original engine manufacturer on Form 8130-3 with blocks 13a.

to 13th (left). For countries that do not have bilateral aircraft maintenance agreements with Brazil or do not have technical agreements between civil aviation authorities, the certification procedure for the civil aviation authority of the AMO`s country of origin should be followed.

Comments are closed.